2,006 pics of Jennifer Garner
and 539,235 images of 17,194 celebrities!
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next
-
Jennifer Garner Filmography
Jennifer Garner Gossip
Jennifer Garner Info
Jennifer Garner Is Related
Sources
She plays Herself in the 2007 mag Auto Express.
For the 2007 publication Heavy Metal, she is cast in the role of Clara Forsythe.
Jennifer Garner stars as Cheryl Ann in the 1953 show The 25th Annual Academy Awards.
In 1947, Jennifer Garner plays Herself in the 58th Annual Tournament of Roses Parade.
For the 2007 production Amazing Moments: National Geographic's Most Daring Moments, Sarah Troyer.
For the 2002 video American Nymphette 5, she plays Diane Agostini.
Jennifer Garner plays Herself/Presenter in the 1997 video release of Anal Perversions of Lolita.
For the 1994 video Anal Planet, Jennifer Garner stars as Herself - Presenter: Short Subject Awards (Animated Award: with 'Mickey Mouse').
For the 1993 Anal Praxis Dr. Med Pervers, she plays the part of Elektra Natchios.
For the 1996 video Anal Princess, Herself (Hostess).
In 2005, she stars as Nurse Sandra in the video Anal Retentive 6.
For the 2005 video release of Anal School 1, Herself.
Jennifer Garner plays the part of Herself/Sydney Bristow in the 1921 show The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
In 1975, Jennifer Garner stars as Woman in Elevator in the production of Aecheoiligi.
She stars as Sydney A. Bristow in the 1992 production of All Can Become a Rose.
In 2003, she stars as Kiley Bradshaw in the production of Alphorn, Das.
She takes the role of Kelly in the 1923 production of The American Plan.
In 1982, Jennifer Garner plays the part of Herself - Host: Technical Awards Banquet in the movie Ao Sul do Meu Corpo.
For the 1912 movie Assisi, Italy, Jennifer Garner plays the part of Herself.
She stars as Nell Glennon (1998) in the 1995 production Bonjour tristesse.
In 2002, Jennifer Garner stars as Mary Rose Clayborne/Victoria Elliot at 17 in the Break Ya Neck with Busta Rhymes.
She plays the part of Sasha in the 1964 feature Avventura dei Monti Pallidi, L'.
In 1986, Jennifer Garner is cast in the role of Elektra Natchios in the show Biao wang.
In 2009, Jennifer Garner plays Jenna Rink in the production of Brimstone.
Jennifer Garner's character is Herself - Co-presenter: Outstanding Made for TV Movie/Nominee: Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series in the 1995 show BSR: The Trash Movie.
Stacey Sampanahoditra in the 1921 release of Casa dos Filhos dos Soldados do Porto, A.
She takes the role of Herself (Winner of Best Actress in a Drama Series in the 1980 movie Charlots contre Dracula, Les.
In 1992, she is cast in the role of Marian Almond in the release of Colonna sonora.
Jennifer Garner is cast in the role of Herself - Nominee: Best Actress in a Television Series [Drama] in the 2007 production Deadly Suspicion.
For the 2006 show Crossing the Line, Jennifer Garner is cast in the role of Annabell.
For the 2005 release of The Crow: Wicked Prayer, Jennifer Garner plays Romy Sullivan.
Jennifer Garner stars as Herself in the 1974 feature Disputa, La.
In 2007, Herself - Winner: Best Actress in a Television Series [Drama] in the video Fraternity Massacre at Hell Island.
Jennifer Garner plays Herself in the 1961 show Go Naked in the World.
In 1972, she stars as Herself - Nominee: Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series in the production of Gold.
In 2002, Herself - Winner: Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Drama Series in the production of Goldfish in a Blender, A.
For the 1933 release of The Good Companions, Jennifer Garner plays Herself - Co-presenter: Best Supporting Actress in a Television Series, Mini-Series or Made for TV Movie and Best Supporting Actress in a Television Series, Mini-Series or Made for TV Movie/Nominee: Best Actress in a Television Series [Drama].
In 1958, she plays the part of Herself in the feature Grad od deset ljeta.
In 1967, Jennifer Garner plays the part of Herself in the movie Group Hunting on the Spring Ice: Part 1.
For the 1992 release of Hard les: honban zetsugi, Jennifer Garner's character is Herself.
Weinstein Co. milks 'Butter'
Film News: Jennifer Garner stars and produces comedy -- The Weinstein Co. has come on board the comedy "Butter" with Jennifer Garner starring and producing along with Mike Deluca.
on 2010-03-16 04:47:38Jennifer Garner & Seraphina Out For a Stroll
Taking advantage of the mild weather, Jennifer Garner was spotted out for a walk with Seraphina Rose on Friday (March 12).
The ?Valentine?s Day? actress looked to be in good spirits as she pushed her 1-year-old baby girl in a little red car in their Br
on 2010-03-14 04:47:31Jennifer Garner And Violet: Juice Bar Buddies
Always the precious mother-daughter duo, Jennifer Garner and daughter Violet Affleck were spotted enjoying the sunny weather in Santa Monica, California on Friday (March 12).
After picking up her adorable little girl from pre-school, the pair took a strol
on 2010-03-13 04:50:18Jennifer Garner and Violet: Juice Bar Buddies
Always the precious mother-daughter duo, Jennifer Garner and daughter Violet Affleck were spotted enjoying the sunny weather in Santa Monica, California on Friday (March 12).
After picking up her adorable little girl from pre-school, the pair took a st
on 2010-03-13 04:50:09Caught! Sweet Jennifer Garner Strikes Again!
Jennifer Garner was spotted out in Beverly Hills recently, beautifying that face America really seems to friggin' love.
The mother of two, and husband of one Ben Affleck, was seen...
on 2010-03-02 04:46:04Jennifer Garner Takes Note of Her Situation
Jennifer Garner mixed plaid and stripes yesterday while out running errands in LA, during which she found a comfortable bench to sit down and take notes during a phone call. The Valentine's Day star is back to her at-home routine of fun days with her daug
on 2010-02-27 04:51:10Bitch-Back! Give Jennifer Garner a Break?
Dear Ted:
I really think you need to give Jennifer Garner a break. There was a time not so long ago that on a daily basis E! had a picture of Garner picking up her daughter at preschool....
on 2010-02-24 04:45:47Jennifer Garner Says Being a Mom Has Taught Her All Kids "Are Loved"
Jennifer Garner was casual for a grocery store run in LA on Saturday morning, but yesterday she was pretty in pink for the "I Have a Dream" Foundation's Gospel Brunch. She's a longtime supporter of the philanthropic organization, after turning out for the
on 2010-02-23 04:51:03Jennifer Garner Hits Gelson?s, Gears Up For Butter
Keeping on top of the household needs, Jennifer Garner was busy taking care of her grocery shopping list while out in Los Angeles, California on Saturday afternoon (February 20).
The 37-year-old brunette beauty hit up the local Gelson’s Supermarket,
on 2010-02-22 04:49:02Jennifer Garner: Gospel Brunch Beauty
Doing her part to make the world a better place, Jennifer Garner stepped out for the “I Have a Dream” Foundation’s 12th Annual Gospel Brunch in West Hollywood on Sunday (February 21).
Held at the House of Blues, the “Ghosts of G
on 2010-02-22 04:48:39Jennifer Garner Hits Gelson?s, Gears Up for Butter
Keeping on top of the household needs, Jennifer Garner was busy taking care of her grocery shopping list while out in Los Angeles, California on Saturday afternoon (February 20).
The 37-year-old brunette beauty hit up the local Gelson’s Supermark
on 2010-02-21 04:47:05Jennifer Garner: Perfect Mother
Keeping on top of her motherly duties, Jennifer Garner was spotted picking up her daughter Violet Affleck in Santa Monica on Thursday afternoon (February 18).
The adorable duo headed out of the pre-school classroom exit, easing past awaiting paparazzi bef
on 2010-02-20 04:49:42Jennifer Garner: Helping Seraphina Take Her First Steps
Watching her baby girl as she blossoms into a little lady, Jennifer Garner was spotted holding Seraphina Affleck’s hand as she took her first steps in Pacific Palisades, California on Monday (February 15).
Not entirely stable on her own, little S
on 2010-02-16 04:50:22Jennifer Garner Wants To Be Wooed
Jennifer Garner loves to feel "wooed".The 'Valentine's Day' actress - who has two children, Violet, four, and 13-month-old Seraphina with husband Ben Affleck - insists she doesn't need huge amounts of money to be spent for her spouse to show his love.She
on 2010-02-14 04:46:25Jennifer Garner Gives Dolphin Aquatic Ecstasy
Jennifer Garner once brought a dolphin to orgasm.The 37-year-old actress was researching a role for TV show 'Fantasy Island', in which a dolphin turns into a girl, but admits the friendly mammal got a little too excited.She said: "I had my feet dangling i
on 2010-02-11 04:49:19Jennifer Garner and Jessica Biel Have Valentine's Girl Crushes
Jessica Biel and Jennifer Garner reunited after Monday's West Coast premiere of Valentine's Day with an appearance on Good Morning America today - check out the video below. Jen was by herself last night when she stopped by The Late Show, and likewise she
on 2010-02-11 04:51:22What to TiVo: Thursday
ABC is new with The Deep End, Grey's Anatomy, and Private Practice
CBS is new with the season premiere of Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains and The Mentalist
FOX has a repeat of Bones and is new with Past Life
NBC is new with Community, Parks and Recreation,
on 2010-02-11 04:51:33Katie and Suri in NYC, Channing's Lap Dance For Ellen, and Jennifer on Romance With Ben
Katie Holmes and Suri Cruise get cute together in NYC while Channing Tatum shows Ellen DeGeneres the skills he learned as a male stripper! Jennifer Garner dishes on her relationship with Ben Affleck and more - watch PopSugar Rush!
on 2010-02-11 04:51:21Jennifer Garner: Letterman Lovely
Hot on the promotional trail, Jennifer Garner was out at the Ed Sullivan Theatre in New York City on Tuesday afternoon (February 9).
The former “Alias” actress gave a big wave as she readied for an appearance on the “Late Show with Da
on 2010-02-10 04:51:41Jennifer Garner: Business-Minded in Beverly Hills
Kicking the week off with some errands, Jennifer Garner was spotted out and about in Beverly Hills on Monday (February 8).
Looking to be in a hurry, the brunette beauty quickly walked down the street, and looked darling in a black skirt and boots toppe
on 2010-02-09 04:49:00Jennifer Garner: Business-Minded In Beverly Hills
Kicking the week off with some errands, Jennifer Garner was spotted out and about in Beverly Hills on Monday (February 8).
Looking to be in a hurry, the brunette beauty quickly walked down the street, and looked darling in a black skirt and boots topped w
on 2010-02-09 04:49:36What to TiVo: Tuesday
ABC is new with Lost and The Forgotten
CBS is new with NCIS, NCIS: Los Angeles, and The Good Wife
FOX is new with American Idol and Past Life
NBC is new with The Biggest Loser: Couples
The CW has repeats of 90210 and Melrose Place
Bravo is new with Milli
on 2010-02-09 04:51:08Jennifer Garner's Weight Gain Fear
Jennifer Garner is worried she's going to get fat once she stops breastfeeding.The 'Valentine's Day' actress is currently nursing her 13-month-old daughter Seraphina and fears she may pile on the pounds once she gives up.Jennifer - who also has a four-yea
on 2010-02-05 04:49:07Jennifer and Jessica Valentine's Day Girl Friends
Jennifer Garner and Jessica Biel make a gorgeous duo on the cover of Marie Claire's Girlfriends Issue which hits newsstands Feb. 9. The two became fast friends while filming Valentine's Day after which Jessica revealed her girlcrush on Garner. The two go
on 2010-02-04 04:50:19Jennifer Garner: Schoolhouse Mommy
Tending to her motherly duties Jennifer Garner was spotted out on a schoolhouse run in Santa Monica on Tuesday afternoon (February 2).
Toting little Seraphina in her arms, the “Alias” actress was helped by a nanny who scooped up a smiley Viole
on 2010-02-04 04:49:18Jennifer Garner & Ashton Kutcher Reveal Valentine's Day Plans with their Spouses
ET's own Mary Hart sat down with 'Valentine's Day' stars Jennifer Garner and Ashton Kutcher on Friday, and the two shared their plans for celebrating the love holiday with their famous spouses. "Demi [Moore] and I have done enough Valentine's Da
on 2010-01-30 04:47:10Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner: LA Lovers
Looking very much in love, Ben Affleck was spotted spending time alongside Jennifer Garner in Los Angeles, California on Tuesday afternoon (January 26).
Meeting up after tending to separate matters, the “Juno” actress and her “Good W
on 2010-01-27 04:50:33Watch Ben Affleck's Sundance Red Carpet and Plans to Teams Up With Damon Again!
Ben Affleck hopped on a private jet and headed straight from the Haiti telethon to Sundance on Friday night, where he braved a blizzard and arrived late to his premiere but still graciously stuck around the red carpet to talk to the press. He chatted abou
on 2010-01-27 04:51:55Jennifer Shops With the Girls as Ben Talks Emails
Jennifer Garner brought Violet and Seraphina out for a stop by the Brentwood Farmers Market yesterday, though she was out today to shop solo. The trio stayed behind in LA over the weekend while Ben Affleck was at Sundance to premiere The Company Men. Ben
on 2010-01-27 04:51:56Jennifer Garner: Farmers Market Mommy
With her actor husband Ben Affleck out of town at the Sundance Film Festival, Jennifer Garner was on mommy duty in Brentwood on Sunday (January 24).
Happy to see the sunshine after a rainy week on the west coast, the former “Alias” actress
on 2010-01-25 04:47:51-
wrote in message
news:1149669598.840812.187040@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> them what they want and then they'll go away." However with these two
> publicity hounds.................................must I finish??? They
> could just as easily QUIETLY negotiated and donated, but that wouldn't
> have given them the publicity HIGH that they crave. IMHO
>
You are so right. They could have easily have done what SJP did, just go
about your life and if they take a picture of your child, they take a
picture of your child! Sheesh. I didn't see Jennifer Garner putting up
much fuss either (I could be wrong). Her daughter is adorable, imo.
Puzz
-
"As far as I know there have been only two movies that presented
12/7/41 more or less in its entirety: PH and TTT. "
Well, that only indicates that your historical understanding is even
less than your artistic judgement. Tora x3, however artistically
limited, was a fair docudrama type depiction of those events. Pearl
Harbor was a travesty in historic and artistic terms, a banal film
which cynically used real events to give it a veneer of respectability.
They lost me a few minutes in, when our boy heroes were playing aircrew
and calling out enemies on a clock system in 1930 that wasn't used
until WW2. The list of inaccuracies was a virtual tran of the
film. The nice thing about seeing a film like that on tape or dvd is
the fast forward button; seeing it in a theatre for a historically
minded person is apt to induce uncontrollable rage. Anyone who could
have sat through that thing without rage or contempt would be an
historical ignoramus or a member of Jerry Bruckheimer's entourage.
Then there's the money decisions. If this movie was the nail in the
coffin of Ben Affleck's big screen career, it did some good at least.
It also indicated Kate Beckinsale's small screen destiny. I noted the
prominance of James (or Jamie) King's obvious lack of screen presence
while Jennifer Garner was shoved behind wallflower goggles in the
backround. And someone was obviously telling Tom Sizemore that "More"
was needed.
-
"grapheme" wrote in message
news:12236rdgrv8u8b5@news.supernews.com...
> news:u9bUf.67$2H1.4437@snnrp1.syd4.maint.ops.aspac.uu.net...
> her well.
That bitch Matt better not get between the two of them.
-
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:11:23 +1100, "Rick in Oz"
wrote:
>http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-03-22/
>Tinseltown mothers in favor of healthy eating and a light exercise regime.
>The Alias star, who gave birth to daughter Violet last December, has
>enlisted the help of fitness guru Valerie Waters to shed the extra weight
>gained during her pregnancy. Waters says, "Jen is on target to getting back
>her pre-baby figure through moderate exercising and sensible eating. She's
>not jumping on that celeb mom bandwagon of getting super-skinny,
>super-quickly. She is more concerned about keeping healthy and spending time
>with Violet than anything else. So because she's a busy career woman and a
>hands-on mum who nurses the baby, it's unrealistic for her to aim for a
>rigorous exercise regime. I think it's great that Jen doesn't obsess about
>her weight and is losing it at a sensible rate."
Good for her! That's the sane way to do it. :-)
--
"Every one of the innocents who died on Sept. 11 was the most important person on earth to somebody.
Every death extinguished a world." -- President George W. Bush, 12/11/2001
www.hillary-watch.org
-
"Rick in Oz" wrote in message
news:u9bUf.67$2H1.4437@snnrp1.syd4.maint.ops.aspac.uu.net...
> http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-03-22/
> by
> Tinseltown mothers in favor of healthy eating and a light exercise regime.
> The Alias star, who gave birth to daughter Violet last December, has
> enlisted the help of fitness guru Valerie Waters to shed the extra weight
> gained during her pregnancy. Waters says, "Jen is on target to getting
> back
> her pre-baby figure through moderate exercising and sensible eating. She's
> not jumping on that celeb mom bandwagon of getting super-skinny,
> super-quickly. She is more concerned about keeping healthy and spending
> time
> with Violet than anything else. So because she's a busy career woman and a
> hands-on mum who nurses the baby, it's unrealistic for her to aim for a
> rigorous exercise regime. I think it's great that Jen doesn't obsess about
> her weight and is losing it at a sensible rate."
>
Good for her. She seems like a genuinely sweet person. I hope Ben treats
her well.
-
Don Tomlinson wrote:
> "f5" wrote in message
> news:k7ydnc_9DobPy7zZRVn-pg@magma.ca...
> didn't even seem to know how good looking she was.
And she has such a cute laugh
--
preesi
~~~~~~~~~
"If you've got a passion for fashion, and you've got a craving for
saving, take the wheel of your automobile, and swing on down to Ideal."
~~~~~~~~~ My Websites and Favorite Links: http://tinyurl.com/yvw45
Yahoo/SidekickII Name: MissPreesi
Skype: Preesi
-
Don Tomlinson wrote:
> "f5" wrote in message news:k7ydnc_9DobPy7zZRVn-pg@magma.ca...
> even seem to know how good looking she was.
She has always struck me as a very genuine person, which is why I'm a
big fan of hers. I think she's great. And, you have to give her
credit, with the work she has done on Alias, she is most certainly one
of the hardest working actresses out there. She rocks!
-
Don Tomlinson wrote:
> "f5" wrote in message news:k7ydnc_9DobPy7zZRVn-pg@magma.ca...
> even seem to know how good looking she was.
I hope Ben deserves her.
mc
-
"f5" wrote in message news:k7ydnc_9DobPy7zZRVn-pg@magma.ca...
> news:u9bUf.67$2H1.4437@snnrp1.syd4.maint.ops.aspac.uu.net...
I saw her on Ellen DeGeneres and she was really down to earth. She didn't
even seem to know how good looking she was.
-
"Rick in Oz" wrote in message
news:u9bUf.67$2H1.4437@snnrp1.syd4.maint.ops.aspac.uu.net...
> http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-03-22/
> adopted by
> Tinseltown mothers in favor of healthy eating and a light exercise
> regime.
> The Alias star, who gave birth to daughter Violet last December, has
> enlisted the help of fitness guru Valerie Waters to shed the extra
> weight
> gained during her pregnancy. Waters says, "Jen is on target to
> getting back
> her pre-baby figure through moderate exercising and sensible eating.
> She's
> not jumping on that celeb mom bandwagon of getting super-skinny,
> super-quickly. She is more concerned about keeping healthy and
> spending time
> with Violet than anything else. So because she's a busy career woman
> and a
> hands-on mum who nurses the baby, it's unrealistic for her to aim
> for a
> rigorous exercise regime. I think it's great that Jen doesn't obsess
> about
> her weight and is losing it at a sensible rate."
What a breath of fresh air! A nice change from "it's all about
meeeeeee".
-
http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-03-22/
Garner Loses Baby Weight Slowly
New mom Jennifer Garner has turned her back on the extreme diets adopted by
Tinseltown mothers in favor of healthy eating and a light exercise regime.
The Alias star, who gave birth to daughter Violet last December, has
enlisted the help of fitness guru Valerie Waters to shed the extra weight
gained during her pregnancy. Waters says, "Jen is on target to getting back
her pre-baby figure through moderate exercising and sensible eating. She's
not jumping on that celeb mom bandwagon of getting super-skinny,
super-quickly. She is more concerned about keeping healthy and spending time
with Violet than anything else. So because she's a busy career woman and a
hands-on mum who nurses the baby, it's unrealistic for her to aim for a
rigorous exercise regime. I think it's great that Jen doesn't obsess about
her weight and is losing it at a sensible rate."
-
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 23:42:31 +1100, "Rick in Oz"
wrote:
>http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2005/12/30/1373716-ap.html
>helicopters. Some are brazen enough to openly brandish their cameras, like
>old western gunslingers.
>moments - is coveted. They are the paparazzi, purveyors of pix that are the
>lifeblood of the weekly star-tracking mags and tabs. Their photos demand
>huge sums of money and are circulated worldwide. And as the public hunger
>for such glossy grist has grown they've become ever more relentless and
>ruthless. But starting Jan. 1, there'll be some new reins on the paparazzi
>parade.
>against overly aggressive photographers - dubbed "stalkerazzi" - who
>forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a
>celebrity's vehicle. They will now be liable for three times the damages
>they inflict; plus they'll lose any payments their published photos might
>earn. Publishers can also be held liable.
>celebrity anywhere in California," said Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, who
>drafted the bill, which was signed into law in October by Gov. Arnold
>Schwarzenegger. (The former actor had an infamous paparazzi moment in 1998
>when they used their cars to surround his SUV as he and wife Maria Shriver
>picked up their child from school.)
>said. In May, a photographer following Lindsay Lohan crashed into the
>actress's car in West Los Angeles. The photographer was booked for assault
>with a deadly weapon, but prosecutors found insufficient evidence to press
>charges.
>Disneyland parking lot after being followed by paparazzi, and actress Reese
>Witherspoon said photographers tried to run her car off the road in April.
>No criminal charges resulted from those incidents, but the Los Angeles
>district attorney's office continues to investigate paparazzi photographers'
>aggressive tactics, said spokeswoman Jane Robison.
>attempt to get the photograph."
>increasingly aggressive behaviour, others call it unfair and unnecessary.
>And it may even be unconstitutional.
>chilling effect" on newspapers and other media, said Jim Ewert, legal
>counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association.
>potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous
>lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," he said. "The
>constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts
>the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."
>infringement on the rights of journalists."
>until they catch the celebrity in a state of compromise," she said. "They
>engage in assaultive behaviour, and we can't condone that."
>photo agency - which bills itself as "the Hollywood Hunt Club" - said
>existing laws already cover attempted assaults and that the new legislation
>unfairly targets celebrity photographers.
>celebrity photographer?" he asked.
>paparazzi have emerged to fill the pages with images of the rich and famous.
>The more exclusive the photo, the bigger the paycheque, said former
>celebrity photographer Brad Elterman.
>could be worth $500,000 US, he said. Even less-exclusive pics of hot stars
>can sell for $10,000 or more.
>pictures don't care how they get the photo because they have nothing to
>lose."
>photojournalist by day and a paparazzo at night," said paparazzi photography
>has always been intrusive, but increasing competition has led to more
>in-your-face tactics. There might be "15 to 20 cars outside someone's house,
>waiting for them to leave so you can chase them down," he said.
>got to rein these guys in, so we don't have a Diana here in Southern
>California," he said, referring to the princess who was killed in a Paris
>car crash in 1997 as paparazzi pursued her vehicle. Investigators later
>found that the driver of Diana's car was intoxicated and speeding.
>their publicists returned calls for comment here.
>overzealous photographers, has said that being photographed is the price one
>pays for celebrity, but some tabloids take things too far.
>Madonna's baby,' there are lots of people who are willing to break the law
>to do that," Clooney told CNN in 2003.
>concept of "constructive trespass" for photojournalists. It said that using
>a long lens to capture an image of a person who had "a reasonable
>expectation of privacy" was tantamount to trespassing.
>questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged
>in court, he said. Laws are presumed valid until challenged.
>probably even more unconstitutional, if that's possible," Ewert said.
>law attempts to stop that conduct with a very broad brush."
They hide in bushes? Gee. Makes you wonder what would happen
if the liberal anti-gun halfwits realize they can do target practice
on their own properties. "Oops, I didn't know he was in the bush
there". Bet you a lot of them turn and join the NRA...
-
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 23:42:31 +1100, "Rick in Oz"
wrote:
>http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2005/12/30/1373716-ap.html
>helicopters. Some are brazen enough to openly brandish their cameras, like
>old western gunslingers.
>moments - is coveted. They are the paparazzi, purveyors of pix that are the
>lifeblood of the weekly star-tracking mags and tabs. Their photos demand
>huge sums of money and are circulated worldwide. And as the public hunger
>for such glossy grist has grown they've become ever more relentless and
>ruthless. But starting Jan. 1, there'll be some new reins on the paparazzi
>parade.
>against overly aggressive photographers - dubbed "stalkerazzi" - who
>forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a
>celebrity's vehicle. They will now be liable for three times the damages
>they inflict; plus they'll lose any payments their published photos might
>earn. Publishers can also be held liable.
>celebrity anywhere in California," said Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, who
>drafted the bill, which was signed into law in October by Gov. Arnold
>Schwarzenegger. (The former actor had an infamous paparazzi moment in 1998
>when they used their cars to surround his SUV as he and wife Maria Shriver
>picked up their child from school.)
>said. In May, a photographer following Lindsay Lohan crashed into the
>actress's car in West Los Angeles. The photographer was booked for assault
>with a deadly weapon, but prosecutors found insufficient evidence to press
>charges.
>Disneyland parking lot after being followed by paparazzi, and actress Reese
>Witherspoon said photographers tried to run her car off the road in April.
>No criminal charges resulted from those incidents, but the Los Angeles
>district attorney's office continues to investigate paparazzi photographers'
>aggressive tactics, said spokeswoman Jane Robison.
>attempt to get the photograph."
>increasingly aggressive behaviour, others call it unfair and unnecessary.
>And it may even be unconstitutional.
>chilling effect" on newspapers and other media, said Jim Ewert, legal
>counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association.
>potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous
>lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," he said. "The
>constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts
>the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."
>infringement on the rights of journalists."
>until they catch the celebrity in a state of compromise," she said. "They
>engage in assaultive behaviour, and we can't condone that."
>photo agency - which bills itself as "the Hollywood Hunt Club" - said
>existing laws already cover attempted assaults and that the new legislation
>unfairly targets celebrity photographers.
>celebrity photographer?" he asked.
>paparazzi have emerged to fill the pages with images of the rich and famous.
>The more exclusive the photo, the bigger the paycheque, said former
>celebrity photographer Brad Elterman.
>could be worth $500,000 US, he said. Even less-exclusive pics of hot stars
>can sell for $10,000 or more.
>pictures don't care how they get the photo because they have nothing to
>lose."
>photojournalist by day and a paparazzo at night," said paparazzi photography
>has always been intrusive, but increasing competition has led to more
>in-your-face tactics. There might be "15 to 20 cars outside someone's house,
>waiting for them to leave so you can chase them down," he said.
>got to rein these guys in, so we don't have a Diana here in Southern
>California," he said, referring to the princess who was killed in a Paris
>car crash in 1997 as paparazzi pursued her vehicle. Investigators later
>found that the driver of Diana's car was intoxicated and speeding.
>their publicists returned calls for comment here.
>overzealous photographers, has said that being photographed is the price one
>pays for celebrity, but some tabloids take things too far.
>Madonna's baby,' there are lots of people who are willing to break the law
>to do that," Clooney told CNN in 2003.
>concept of "constructive trespass" for photojournalists. It said that using
>a long lens to capture an image of a person who had "a reasonable
>expectation of privacy" was tantamount to trespassing.
>questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged
>in court, he said. Laws are presumed valid until challenged.
>probably even more unconstitutional, if that's possible," Ewert said.
>law attempts to stop that conduct with a very broad brush."
They hide in bushes? Gee. Makes you wonder what would happen
if the liberal anti-gun halfwits realize they can do target practice
on their own properties. "Oops, I didn't know he was in the bush
there". Bet you a lot of them turn and join the NRA...
-
Rick in Oz wrote:
> http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2005/12/30/1373716-ap.html
> helicopters. Some are brazen enough to openly brandish their cameras, like
> old western gunslingers.
> moments - is coveted. They are the paparazzi, purveyors of pix that are the
> lifeblood of the weekly star-tracking mags and tabs. Their photos demand
> huge sums of money and are circulated worldwide. And as the public hunger
> for such glossy grist has grown they've become ever more relentless and
> ruthless. But starting Jan. 1, there'll be some new reins on the paparazzi
> parade.
> against overly aggressive photographers - dubbed "stalkerazzi" - who
> forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a
> celebrity's vehicle. They will now be liable for three times the damages
> they inflict; plus they'll lose any payments their published photos might
> earn. Publishers can also be held liable.
> celebrity anywhere in California," said Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, who
> drafted the bill, which was signed into law in October by Gov. Arnold
> Schwarzenegger. (The former actor had an infamous paparazzi moment in 1998
> when they used their cars to surround his SUV as he and wife Maria Shriver
> picked up their child from school.)
> said. In May, a photographer following Lindsay Lohan crashed into the
> actress's car in West Los Angeles. The photographer was booked for assault
> with a deadly weapon, but prosecutors found insufficient evidence to press
> charges.
> Disneyland parking lot after being followed by paparazzi, and actress Reese
> Witherspoon said photographers tried to run her car off the road in April.
> No criminal charges resulted from those incidents, but the Los Angeles
> district attorney's office continues to investigate paparazzi photographers'
> aggressive tactics, said spokeswoman Jane Robison.
> attempt to get the photograph."
> increasingly aggressive behaviour, others call it unfair and unnecessary.
> And it may even be unconstitutional.
> chilling effect" on newspapers and other media, said Jim Ewert, legal
> counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association.
> potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous
> lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," he said. "The
> constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts
> the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."
> infringement on the rights of journalists."
> until they catch the celebrity in a state of compromise," she said. "They
> engage in assaultive behaviour, and we can't condone that."
> photo agency - which bills itself as "the Hollywood Hunt Club" - said
> existing laws already cover attempted assaults and that the new legislation
> unfairly targets celebrity photographers.
> celebrity photographer?" he asked.
> paparazzi have emerged to fill the pages with images of the rich and famous.
> The more exclusive the photo, the bigger the paycheque, said former
> celebrity photographer Brad Elterman.
> could be worth $500,000 US, he said. Even less-exclusive pics of hot stars
> can sell for $10,000 or more.
> pictures don't care how they get the photo because they have nothing to
> lose."
> photojournalist by day and a paparazzo at night," said paparazzi photography
> has always been intrusive, but increasing competition has led to more
> in-your-face tactics. There might be "15 to 20 cars outside someone's house,
> waiting for them to leave so you can chase them down," he said.
> got to rein these guys in, so we don't have a Diana here in Southern
> California," he said, referring to the princess who was killed in a Paris
> car crash in 1997 as paparazzi pursued her vehicle. Investigators later
> found that the driver of Diana's car was intoxicated and speeding.
> their publicists returned calls for comment here.
> overzealous photographers, has said that being photographed is the price one
> pays for celebrity, but some tabloids take things too far.
> Madonna's baby,' there are lots of people who are willing to break the law
> to do that," Clooney told CNN in 2003.
> concept of "constructive trespass" for photojournalists. It said that using
> a long lens to capture an image of a person who had "a reasonable
> expectation of privacy" was tantamount to trespassing.
> questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged
> in court, he said. Laws are presumed valid until challenged.
> probably even more unconstitutional, if that's possible," Ewert said.
> law attempts to stop that conduct with a very broad brush."
I totally support this. One of the reasons I participate in this
newsgroup is so I can enjoy the snarky gossip without abetting these
leeches. I don't need to see these photos.
Mez
-
Rick in Oz wrote:
> http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2005/12/30/1373716-ap.html
> helicopters. Some are brazen enough to openly brandish their cameras, like
> old western gunslingers.
> moments - is coveted. They are the paparazzi, purveyors of pix that are the
> lifeblood of the weekly star-tracking mags and tabs. Their photos demand
> huge sums of money and are circulated worldwide. And as the public hunger
> for such glossy grist has grown they've become ever more relentless and
> ruthless. But starting Jan. 1, there'll be some new reins on the paparazzi
> parade.
> against overly aggressive photographers - dubbed "stalkerazzi" - who
> forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a
> celebrity's vehicle. They will now be liable for three times the damages
> they inflict; plus they'll lose any payments their published photos might
> earn. Publishers can also be held liable.
> celebrity anywhere in California," said Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, who
> drafted the bill, which was signed into law in October by Gov. Arnold
> Schwarzenegger. (The former actor had an infamous paparazzi moment in 1998
> when they used their cars to surround his SUV as he and wife Maria Shriver
> picked up their child from school.)
> said. In May, a photographer following Lindsay Lohan crashed into the
> actress's car in West Los Angeles. The photographer was booked for assault
> with a deadly weapon, but prosecutors found insufficient evidence to press
> charges.
> Disneyland parking lot after being followed by paparazzi, and actress Reese
> Witherspoon said photographers tried to run her car off the road in April.
> No criminal charges resulted from those incidents, but the Los Angeles
> district attorney's office continues to investigate paparazzi photographers'
> aggressive tactics, said spokeswoman Jane Robison.
> attempt to get the photograph."
> increasingly aggressive behaviour, others call it unfair and unnecessary.
> And it may even be unconstitutional.
> chilling effect" on newspapers and other media, said Jim Ewert, legal
> counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association.
> potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous
> lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," he said. "The
> constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts
> the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."
> infringement on the rights of journalists."
> until they catch the celebrity in a state of compromise," she said. "They
> engage in assaultive behaviour, and we can't condone that."
> photo agency - which bills itself as "the Hollywood Hunt Club" - said
> existing laws already cover attempted assaults and that the new legislation
> unfairly targets celebrity photographers.
> celebrity photographer?" he asked.
> paparazzi have emerged to fill the pages with images of the rich and famous.
> The more exclusive the photo, the bigger the paycheque, said former
> celebrity photographer Brad Elterman.
> could be worth $500,000 US, he said. Even less-exclusive pics of hot stars
> can sell for $10,000 or more.
> pictures don't care how they get the photo because they have nothing to
> lose."
> photojournalist by day and a paparazzo at night," said paparazzi photography
> has always been intrusive, but increasing competition has led to more
> in-your-face tactics. There might be "15 to 20 cars outside someone's house,
> waiting for them to leave so you can chase them down," he said.
> got to rein these guys in, so we don't have a Diana here in Southern
> California," he said, referring to the princess who was killed in a Paris
> car crash in 1997 as paparazzi pursued her vehicle. Investigators later
> found that the driver of Diana's car was intoxicated and speeding.
> their publicists returned calls for comment here.
> overzealous photographers, has said that being photographed is the price one
> pays for celebrity, but some tabloids take things too far.
> Madonna's baby,' there are lots of people who are willing to break the law
> to do that," Clooney told CNN in 2003.
> concept of "constructive trespass" for photojournalists. It said that using
> a long lens to capture an image of a person who had "a reasonable
> expectation of privacy" was tantamount to trespassing.
> questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged
> in court, he said. Laws are presumed valid until challenged.
> probably even more unconstitutional, if that's possible," Ewert said.
> law attempts to stop that conduct with a very broad brush."
I totally support this. One of the reasons I participate in this
newsgroup is so I can enjoy the snarky gossip without abetting these
leeches. I don't need to see these photos.
Mez
-
http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2005/12/30/1373716-ap.html
New California law hits paparazzi in the pocketbook
By SANDY COHEN
LOS ANGELES (AP) - They lurk in bushes, camp out in cars and hover in
helicopters. Some are brazen enough to openly brandish their cameras, like
old western gunslingers.
They may be hated, but their work - candid pictures of celebs in unguarded
moments - is coveted. They are the paparazzi, purveyors of pix that are the
lifeblood of the weekly star-tracking mags and tabs. Their photos demand
huge sums of money and are circulated worldwide. And as the public hunger
for such glossy grist has grown they've become ever more relentless and
ruthless. But starting Jan. 1, there'll be some new reins on the paparazzi
parade.
That's when a California law goes into effect that increases penalties
against overly aggressive photographers - dubbed "stalkerazzi" - who
forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a
celebrity's vehicle. They will now be liable for three times the damages
they inflict; plus they'll lose any payments their published photos might
earn. Publishers can also be held liable.
"Now the paparazzi are going to have to think twice about chasing down a
celebrity anywhere in California," said Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, who
drafted the bill, which was signed into law in October by Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger. (The former actor had an infamous paparazzi moment in 1998
when they used their cars to surround his SUV as he and wife Maria Shriver
picked up their child from school.)
The new law was inspired by a rash of recent celebrity car chases, Montanez
said. In May, a photographer following Lindsay Lohan crashed into the
actress's car in West Los Angeles. The photographer was booked for assault
with a deadly weapon, but prosecutors found insufficient evidence to press
charges.
In August, actress Scarlett Johansson was involved in a minor car crash in a
Disneyland parking lot after being followed by paparazzi, and actress Reese
Witherspoon said photographers tried to run her car off the road in April.
No criminal charges resulted from those incidents, but the Los Angeles
district attorney's office continues to investigate paparazzi photographers'
aggressive tactics, said spokeswoman Jane Robison.
Montanez said the new legislation "targets those who break the law in their
attempt to get the photograph."
While some celebrity shooters think the new law is needed to curb
increasingly aggressive behaviour, others call it unfair and unnecessary.
And it may even be unconstitutional.
Though the legislation is aimed at paparazzi photographers, it could have "a
chilling effect" on newspapers and other media, said Jim Ewert, legal
counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association.
"This law now gives (celebrities) the ability to quash a photograph, and
potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous
lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," he said. "The
constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts
the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."
Montanez insists the law was "specifically crafted in a way so there is no
infringement on the rights of journalists."
"This is about paparazzi who wait and hunt the celebrities, their prey,
until they catch the celebrity in a state of compromise," she said. "They
engage in assaultive behaviour, and we can't condone that."
Longtime celebrity photographer Frank Griffin, co-owner of the Bauer-Griffin
photo agency - which bills itself as "the Hollywood Hunt Club" - said
existing laws already cover attempted assaults and that the new legislation
unfairly targets celebrity photographers.
"Why should there be different standards for a hard-news photographer and a
celebrity photographer?" he asked.
With the proliferation of photo-filled, celebrity-centred magazines, more
paparazzi have emerged to fill the pages with images of the rich and famous.
The more exclusive the photo, the bigger the paycheque, said former
celebrity photographer Brad Elterman.
Shots of Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner with their new baby, for example,
could be worth $500,000 US, he said. Even less-exclusive pics of hot stars
can sell for $10,000 or more.
"The business is driven by money," Elterman said. "The guys who take the
pictures don't care how they get the photo because they have nothing to
lose."
Jim Ruymen, a Los Angeles photographer for 30 years who worked as "a
photojournalist by day and a paparazzo at night," said paparazzi photography
has always been intrusive, but increasing competition has led to more
in-your-face tactics. There might be "15 to 20 cars outside someone's house,
waiting for them to leave so you can chase them down," he said.
"Part of the paparazzi act is you really have to have no conscience. You've
got to rein these guys in, so we don't have a Diana here in Southern
California," he said, referring to the princess who was killed in a Paris
car crash in 1997 as paparazzi pursued her vehicle. Investigators later
found that the driver of Diana's car was intoxicated and speeding.
Celebrities are likely to appreciate the new legislation, though none of
their publicists returned calls for comment here.
George Clooney, an outspoken defender of the first amendment yet a critic of
overzealous photographers, has said that being photographed is the price one
pays for celebrity, but some tabloids take things too far.
"If you say to someone, 'I'll give you $400,000 for the first picture of
Madonna's baby,' there are lots of people who are willing to break the law
to do that," Clooney told CNN in 2003.
The new legislation amends a bill passed in 1998 that established the
concept of "constructive trespass" for photojournalists. It said that using
a long lens to capture an image of a person who had "a reasonable
expectation of privacy" was tantamount to trespassing.
Ewert, counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association,
questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged
in court, he said. Laws are presumed valid until challenged.
The new legislation, which expands what constitutes invasion of privacy, "is
probably even more unconstitutional, if that's possible," Ewert said.
"We don't apologize for the behaviour of the paparazzi," he said. "But this
law attempts to stop that conduct with a very broad brush."
-
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:49:56 +1100, "Rick in Oz"
wrote:
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/indexd?blogid=7
>rocker Melissa Etheridge in 2004 so he can concentrate on being a family
>man.
>Violet into the world on December 1.
Am I the only one who hates the term "sells up"?
-
Rick in Oz wrote:
> http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=12658086&p=yz658y4x&n=1
> 2658200
> Garner a gift basket to celebrate the birth of their baby daughter.
> December 1, and have been flooded with well wishes from loved ones ever
> since.
> co-star Affleck last year (04), has also stepped in to congratulate the
> couple.
> "She'll always have a special place in her heart for Ben."
It's a "nice" gesture in a way but I wonder how Jennifer Garner feels
about that !! If I was the recipient of such a gift, I would take it to
the homeless shelter or battered woman's shelter and give it to them.
-
http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2005-12-05/
Affleck and Garner Not Sponsored by Starbucks
Ben Affleck has laughed off claims he and wife Jennifer Garner are
sponsored by coffee giants Starbucks to drink its beverages whenever they
are in public. In recent months the expectant parents have barely been
spotted without one of the firm's products - prompting speculation they had
arranged a deal to promote the global brand. But Affleck's publicist insists
in the New York Daily News, "No contract with Starbucks. Maybe Ben likes
Starbucks and is willing to ignore the morons who spend their life waiting
to take the same photo every day of him drinking coffee."
- Celebrity Gossip
- "My husband, was as flabbergasted as I was. I think he almost flew out of his skin, he was so surprised and excited. He is just the most supportive and proud friend. My family is just beyond out- of-control excited." - on winning a Golden Globe.
- "I never get recognized! I'll be with my husband (actor Scott Foley from "Felicity") and people will think I'm his manager, and they'll start giving me their business cards." - on (not) being recognized.
- "We looked him up on IMDb, and we just cracked up - his resumé goes on and on. He was even on "Cagney and Lacey"" - on Alias co-star Carl Lumbly.
- Early in the filming of "Daredevil" while doing a stunt, Jennifer became tangled in the wires that were helping her do a flip and she nearly crashed into a wall that she was supposed to flip off. Ben Affleck, in his Daredevil costume, rushed up to her, grabbed her, and pulled her away from the wall before the accident could finish. Jennifer later commented "It was like he was Superman."
- Played saxophone in high school
- Is a trained ballerina who initially left dance for theater acting.
- Named the #1 sexiest woman of 2001 by MAXIM men's magazine.
- Named one of the 50 Most Beautiful People [People Magazine - May 2002]
- Used to be a hostess at Isabella's restaurant in New York W_hen she was trying to launch her acting career.
- Named one of People Magazine's 'Breakthrough Stars of 2001'.
- Graduated from Denison University, Granville, OH, 1994.
- Earned a theater degree from Ohio's Denison University.
- Was going to go to Yale to study drama, but got an acting job in NYC instead.
- Graduated from George Washington High School in Charleston, WV.
- Met husband Scott Foley on the set of "Felicity" (1998).
-
ImagineContact.com is an online service provider which offers a convenient web gateway to freely available binary content, including but not limited to images of Jennifer Garner, as well as other content associated with celebrities posted within Usenet newsgroups. Users can join instantly online and have access to gigabytes of new images, updated daily. Every night, ImagineContact.com automatically crawls, sorts, converts, thumbnails and indexes these files from the Usenet for access by users on the website. Every day there are hundreds of new images posted to the Usenet.
-
The binary content on ImagineContact.com, including but not limited to any and all images of Jennifer Garner, is directly obtained from the Usenet, and as such, reflects the uploaded files of millions of people worldwide. As an online service provider, ImagineContact.com does not and cannot editorialize the content posted on Usenet.
-
Some Usenet postings may contain nudity, otherwise be of an adult nature or will simply be objectionable to some people. Users who object to such content are advised to not use this service.
-
Pics Info
-
- 1612 x 1212
- J_Garner-LS020910hd-DL.jpg
- Mar 14th, 2010
- alt.binaries.celebrities.alist
-
- 1874 x 2400
- Jessica_Biel-LA-premiere-Valentines_Day-
Feb_2_8_2010_1.jpg
- Feb 15th, 2010
- alt.binaries.celebrities.alist
-
- 1024 x 768
- Jennifer_Garner_P_312.jpg
- Jan 30th, 2010
- alt.binaries.celebrities
-
- 1024 x 768
- Jennifer_Garner_P_311.jpg
- Jan 30th, 2010
- alt.binaries.celebrities
-
Pics Info
-
- 1280 x 1024
- Jennifer_Garner_P_018.jpg
- Jan 30th, 2010
- alt.celebrities
-
- 1612 x 1212
- J_Garner-GoldenGlobe67thhd-DL.jpg
- Jan 22nd, 2010
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities
-
- 1920 x 1088
- J_Garner-GoldenGlobe67th-s1.jpg
- Jan 22nd, 2010
- alt.celebrities
-
- 1290 x 730
- hank-leno-092109-jennifer-garner-0006.jp
g
- Dec 30th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.portra
its.large
-
Pics Info
-
- 1290 x 730
- hank-leno-092109-jennifer-garner-0002.jp
g
- Dec 30th, 2009
- alt.binaries.nude.celebrities
-
- 1290 x 730
- hank-leno-092109-jennifer-garner-0001.jp
g
- Dec 30th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_9.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.celebrities.pics
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_10.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.portra
its
-
Pics Info
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_4.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.repost
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_1.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.repost
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_8.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.celebrities
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_2.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.portra
its.large
-
Pics Info
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_3.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities.portra
its.large
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_5.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.celebrities.pics
-
- 2039 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_6.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.celebrities.diva
-
- 2000 x 3000
- Kelli_Garner-Cleavage-Jeff_Vespa_Photosh
oot_7.jpg
- Dec 25th, 2009
- alt.binaries.celebrities.alist
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next
